top of page

Outcomes in Journal Articles

How to avoid under or over-estimating effects on our patients, when they are shown in different ways.

Outcomes in Journal Articles

Outcomes can be expressed in a multitude of different ways that can be initially confusing for learners. Odds, Risks and Rates have different definitions but are sometimes used interchangeably in the literature.

Risks are the most commonly used and the easiest to understand. Risk represents the number of times the outcome of interest happened in each group we are analyzing. Risks are usually expressed either in decimals or in percentage. Even though the word "Risk" has a negative connotation, in EBM, it only means a probability. It could be a good or a bad outcome. We can be interested in a Risk of Survival, a Risk of Recovery, a Risk of Acute Kidney Injury or a Risk of Mortality.


i.e.: In group A we enrolled 80 patients. At the end of the study, 60 were alive and 20 passed away. We want to calculate the Mortality Risk.


Mortality Risk = 20 (patients that died) / 80 (Total number of patients).

Mortality Risk = 20/80 = 0.25.


Mortality Risk (in Percentage) = 100 * 0.25 = 25%.


Now that we have a way to calculate risks (probabilities), we can use them to compare what happened in the different groups of patients. The only ways to compare groups is to do subtractions or divisions. These lead to Risk Differences (subtractions) and Risk Ratios (divisions).


(Absolute) Risk Differences are the easiest to understand. If the experimental group has a mortality rate of 2% and the control group has a mortality rate of 5%, the difference is a 3% reduction in risk or rate of mortality [2%-5%=(-3%)]. Experimental always goes first by definition. A negative number means there is a reduction in risk and a positive number means an increase in risk compared to control (or baseline)


Risk Ratios are also fairly simple; the stumbling point is that there are multiple ways of expressing the data. Some articles might talk about Hazard Ratios, Risks Ratios (AKA Relative Risk) or Odds Ratios. By definition, Experimental risk should be the numerator and control risk should be the denominator.

In the next blogs we will tease apart the differences in the above ratios. What matters for now is that independently of what the metric is called, the interpretation follows some simple rules:


A ratio is always just a ratio....


A ratio of 1 means no difference in what we are comparing.

A ratio higher than 1 means the experimental groups outcome is higher than baseline.

A ratio lower than 1 means the experimental group outcome is lower than baseline.



For practical examples of how to analyze the journal articles outcomes, please refer to our journal club section. Articles with the RCT or therapy tags should allow trainees to practice understanding outcomes.


The information provided by Critical Thinking in Medicine (“we,” “us,” or “our”) on this website is for general informational purposes only. All content, including text, graphics, images, and information, is presented as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

Please consult with a qualified healthcare provider before making any decisions or taking any action based on the information you find on this Website. Do not disregard, avoid, or delay obtaining medical or health-related advice from your healthcare provider because of something you have read on this Website.

This Website does not recommend or endorse any specific tests, physicians, products, procedures, opinions, or other information that may be mentioned on this website. Reliance on any information provided on the Website, its content creators, or others appearing on the website is solely at your own risk.

If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor, go to the nearest emergency department, or call emergency services immediately. We are not responsible for any adverse effects resulting from your use of or reliance on any information or content on this Website.

By using this Website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer in full.

The Service may contain views and opinions which are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any other author, agency, organization, employer or company, including the Company.

Comments published by users are their sole responsibility and the users will take full responsibility, liability and blame for any libel or litigation that results from something written in or as a direct result of something written in a comment. The Company is not liable for any comment published by users and reserves the right to delete any comment for any reason whatsoever.

Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved. No part of the information on this site may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without prior written permission of the publisher.

Join us and be a part of the Critical Thinking in Medicine Team

Do you have any suggestions, questions or comments? 

Do you want to collaborate?

Contact us @ admin@criticalthinkinginmedicine.com

Help support the website.
Every amount counts!

Donate with PayPal

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

bottom of page